Comma. Introductory words

18.08.2020

11.07.2016

Interests of patients and states disagree

Healthcare crisis develops. The process goes from two sides, but the reason for its one: economic difficulties. This is if you put it beautifully. And if simply - the money is less and less at both sides: both by the state and the population. The state health care is far from priority, and it all reduces its financing. An insignificant 3.7% of GDP was 3.4%. Dear patients want to be treated - pay money. But patients are less and less. Read more in the "Independent Newspaper" material.

The bad symptom: sales of drugs that year from year to year, in the first quarter of 2016 were collapsed for the first time in the history of observations. This is a disturbing signal, because on drugs, people save last. Feel the overall decline in income level and private medical companies, which just hoped to increase profits, taking into account the bad state of affairs in state medicine. Sales of voluntary health insurance policies fell, many firms refused to provide their employees.

However, they assure that yield decreased, but not critical: because the rate of profit, which is initially laid Russian investors, higher than in the West - not 3-5%, and 25%. Patients Volynes-Noles have to contact private medicine, because the availability of optimized state is sharply reduced.

What is not surprising with this financing. Some exit is trying to find in public-private partnership (PPP). But here, not everything is safely, which showed a survey conducted by a consulting company IPT Group. The main problem that could be expected in the conditions of the crisis is the lack of investors. This reason was noted 58% of respondents. In second place - the lack of implementation of such projects, which indicated 49% of respondents, on the third - legislative complexity of PPP in medicine (16%).

Investors are counting on profits, this is a business, and not charity. At the same time, the appetites of Russian investors are not small, not Western 3-5% of profits. And then the fall in oil prices, which do not think to rise, the economic crisis. One of the first experiments of PPP - Transfer in 2013 Clinical Hospital No. 63 to the concession to the European Medical Center. The hospital was going to rebuild, make the super-modern and a third of the patients promised to treat in it polish OMS. It would seem that prospects are the most center of Moscow, investors are non-bonds and connections. But crisis hit. Three years have passed, the hospital is closed, collapsed. Prospects have changed. Now the European Medical Center is trying to terminate the concession agreement.

It is no longer coming to the concession of other medical institutions. Another project is the so-called OMS +. That is, the patient pays extra charges of compulsory health insurance for its entire amount and for it receives additional services in the urban state clinic. The pilot program was launched from July 1, 2015 in five regions: Tyumen, Lipetsk, Kirov, Belgorod regions and in Tatarstan. She did not have success. Do not buy even for children. In the Kirov region, for example, for the age of 2015, only three extended "Healthy Baby" was sold. For children, they do not regret money - when they are. In 2017, it is planned to introduce the CHI + program throughout the country.

What will happen from it is unclear. No matter how creating conditions for abuses. After all, it is so easy to make the patient pay for what he relies for free. The developers of the OMS + program began it when the economic situation in the country was completely different. PPP, "Dr. Next", now here is the OMS +. What kind of projects did not turn out.

So what to do? Insecurity, it is necessary to tear off if the Finance Minister Anton Siluanov proposes to reduce health care costs from 45.8 to 13 billion rubles. "I have such an impression that all the financial lobby works against health," says Leonid Roshal president of the National Medical Chamber. The desire of power to improve medical care, reducing health expenditures, resembles an anecdote as Gypsies did not have his own horse. It was completely taught, yes she died.

If the introductory word can be omitted or rearranged to another place of proposal without a violation of its structure (usually it happens under the unions "and" and "but"), the Union is not included in the introductory design - comma need.

For example: "First, it became dark, and, secondly, everyone is tired."

If the introductory word to remove or rearrange it is impossible, then comma after the union (usually under the Union "A") not put.

For example: "She just forgot about this fact, and maybe he never remembered him," "..., and therefore ...", "..., and maybe ...", "..., which means ...".

If the introductory word can be removed or rearranged, then the comma need After the Union "A", since it is not associated with the introductory word.

For example: "She didn't just love him, but maybe even despised."

If a composite union is worth a sustaining union ("and", "also", "and then", "and then", "and", "and", "and", " as well as "and others), and then the introductory word, then comma in front of him need not.

For example: "And indeed, it was not worth it"; "And perhaps, it was necessary to do somehow differently." "Finally, the action of the play is ordered and divided into acts"; "Yes, in addition, other circumstances were also found out." "But of course, everything ended well."

It is rare: if at the beginning of the offer standing Soyuz, but introductory construction Highlights intonation, the commas are needed.

For example: "But, to my great annoyance, Swabrin decisively declared ..."; "And, as usual, just one good remembered."

Always write without commas:

first of all

at first sight

surely

similarly

more or less

literally

in addition

in (finite) result

in the end

in extreme cases

best case scenario

anyway

however,

overall

mostly

especially

in some cases

no matter what

subsequently

otherwise

as a result

concerning

in this case

in the same time

in this regard

mainly

often

exclusively

as maximum

meaning

just in case

in case of emergency

if possible

as far as possible

still

practically

about

with all (when)

when (everyone) desire

on occasion

equally

the biggest

most less

actually

in addition

to top off

by the proposal

by decree

by decision

traditionally

The comma does not put at the beginning of the sentence:

"Before ... I found myself ..."

"Since…"

"Before as…"

"Although…"

"As…"

"In order to…"

"Instead of…"

"In general ..."

"While…"

"Especially since ..."

"However…"

"Despite the fact that ..." (when there is separately); Before "that" the comma does not put.

"If…"

"After…"

"And ..."

« Finally"In the meaning" finally "- the commas does not stand out.

« And this is despite the fact that ..."- In the middle of the sentence, the comma is always put!

« Based on this, …"- At the beginning of the sentence, the comma is put.

But: "He did so on the basis of ..." - the comma does not put.

« After all, if ..., then ..."- The comma in front of" if "is not put, as the second part of the double union is continued," then ". If "then" is not, then the comma before "if" is put!

« Less than two years ..."- the comma before" what "is not put, because This is not a comparison.

Comma "as" It is placed only in the case of comparison.

« Politicians like Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ... "- the comma is placed, because There is a noun "politicians."

But: "... politicians such as Ivanov, Petrov, Sidorov ... "- before" how "the comma does not put.

Commas do not put:

"Give God", "Do not give God", "For God's sake" - The commas does not stand out, + the word "God" is written with a small letter.

But: commas are put on both sides:

"Thank God"in the middle of the proposal is allocated with commas on both sides (the word "God" in this case is written with a capital letter) + at the beginning of the sentence - is allocated with a comma (on the right side).

"To God" - In these cases, commas are put on both sides (the word "God" in this case is written with a small letter).

"Oh my God" - allocated with commas on both sides; In the middle of the offer "God" - with a small letter.

There are rules in Russian, the wording of which is quite complicated, it is difficult to reduce it to some elementary scheme (for example, the rule spelling rule). At first glance, the rule of punctuation marks in the introductory words, phrases and suggestions is the only wording - they are allocated on the letter from two sides with commas. However, in fact, the difficulties associated with the use of input words and phrases, lead to a huge number of errors in the written works of schoolchildren and applicants.

The standard errors associated with punctuation under introductory words are the following:
The word is not allocated, which is introduced;
The word is distinguished, erroneously taken for the introductory, but not as such;
Peer inaccurately uses punctuation signs when you turn on the introductory word into text.
In the first paragraph of this article, you can find four cases of use of rules for punctuation under introductory words, although the introductory word in it is one - for example. The word "however" is not in the proposed input context, performing the function of the Union "But", the combination of "at first glance" and "actually", considered by many writing as the introductory, are not at all.

So, what words will be introduced and what are the features of the use of punctuation marks during introductory structures?

Introductors call words and suggestions, grammatically associated with the general structure of the proposal. Introductors are not members of the sentence, it is impossible to raise the question. Introductory offers and plug-in structures are not included in the general proposal scheme, are comments that are not related or not closely related to the general sense of the proposal. And introductory words, and introductory proposals are isolated, that is, the writeer enjoys the distinguishing acquisition mark - pair commas, dash, brackets.

Below we will try to understand the specifics of the rules for the use of inner words and phrases in the text. In order for everyone to control how accurately he understood the proposed section of the rules, after each fragment, exercises for independent parsing will be proposed. Our exercises are somewhat different from those offered in most textbooks. These are not separate phrases, but connected text, not quite traditional in content, but extremely saturated with introductory combinations, which will make it possible to more effectively work the rules.

Basic rule: the introductory word or phrase is released by commas on both sides.

The main mistake of most typewriters is related to the inaccurate knowledge of the list of input words. Therefore, first of all, you should learn which words can be introductable, which groups of input words can be allocated and what words are never introductory.

Groups of input words.

1. Introductory words expressing the feelings of the speaker in connection with the said: Fortunately, unfortunately, unfortunately, to the annoyance, to the horror, on trouble, which is good ...
2. Introductory words expressing the estimate of the speaker degree of reliability of what he said: Of course, it certainly, of course, is undoubtedly obviously certain, probably, it is probably true, maybe it should be, it seems, apparently, apparently Essentially, in fact, I think ... This group of input words is most numerous.
3. Introductory words indicating the sequence of outlined thoughts and their relationship between themselves: first, so, therefore, in general, it means, by the way, further, however, finally, on the one hand ... This group is also large enough and insidious.
4. Introductory words pointing to techniques and ways of thinking: in words, in other words, in other words, or rather, more precisely, so to speak ...
5. Introductory words indicating the source of the message: they say, in my opinion, according to ..., according to rumors, according to information ..., according to ..., in my opinion, I remember ...
6. Introductory words, representing the appeal of the speaker to the interlocutor: you see (Lee), you know, understand, sorry, please agree ...
7. Introductory words indicating an assessment of a measure of what the following says: at least at least ...
8. Introductory words showing the usual value of what happened: happens, it happened, as usual ...
9. Introductory words expressing the expressiveness of the statement: In addition to jokes, it is funny to say, to be honest, between us saying ...

Mistakes of writing are associated, first of all, with the wrong characteristic of the word as an introductory, in other words, with the separation of a word that is not introductory.

Are not introductory words and are not allocated by commas on the letter the following words:
literally, in addition, suddenly, after all, so, it is unlikely that, after all, ultimately, hardly, even, precisely, exclusively, as if, as if, just, meanwhile, almost therefore Therefore, approximately, approximately, moreover, just, stronger, as if... - This group includes particles and adverbs, most often rendered to be mistaken as introductory.
according to the tradition, on the advice ..., at the direction ..., on demand ..., by order ..., according to the plan ... - These combinations act as an optional suggestion members - on the advice of the older sister, she decided to enter Moscow State University. By order of the doctor, the patient was planted on a strict diet. According to the author of the author, the novel was to cover the period until 1825.

Task 1. Put the missed punctuation marks. Try to figure out which groups are entry words used in the text.

To my shame I do not read serious literature, preferring to her detectives and between us saying love novels. Firstly, I seem to not always correctly catch the idea of \u200b\u200bthe author, but I know how to watch the plot of the criminal story. Secondly, I strongly do not interest the descriptions of the fictional experiences of the heroes, so I try almost half of the book as usual. Apparently, I am just from those people who gently expressing should not read "serious" literature. In addition, this literature in my opinion is often written by people who did not fully realize themselves in practical activity in other words of the unemployed, and detectives are created by former and real employees of the competent authorities who agree to prove their right to understand the essence described by them. Of course, from the point of view of style, these novels to Zavorbye seemed to be written off by one from the other, but the stories are capable of even a doubt even a deserved philologist.
For example, they cannot fail to carry novels on weekdays of police officers. According to literature, these books are allegedly deprived of artistic advantages. Therefore, the reading of such a work does not develop our intellect in the essence, but trust the pleasure of the process of complicity in the investigation of a bloody crime essentially adds so much adrenaline that intelligence increases as if by itself. It happens the reader earlier than the heroes of the novel guessed who, according to the author, commits a crime. There can be exactly this illusion of your superiority over the police participating in action gives you among the other, the feeling of involvement in the romance plot, whereas, unfortunately, no one can even virtually imagine himself one of the heroes of the postmodern novel.
Further, any reading detective knows that evil will ultimately be punished and goes without saying justice will triumph. Thus, these books make it possible to hope for the celebration of good and in my opinion already one thing is quite a good reason for the publication of such in essence who do not interfere with the works. Maybe many will not agree with me, but you agree we all know people who have never mastered the "wars and peace" and hardly remember the content of the novel "Oblomov", but honestly, even my familiar professors and academicians often spend their leisurely New detective.

Depending on the context, the same words can act as in the role of introductory words, then as members of the sentence:

Maybe it should be, it seems act as introductory, if you indicate the degree of reliability of the reported - maybe I will come tomorrow? Our teacher has no two days; Maybe he fell ill. You must have been met for the first time with such a phenomenon. I seem to see him somewhere. The same words may be in the role of the faugible - what can I bring a meeting with you? As a person can be so optional! This should be your independent decision. All this seems to me very suspicious.
Obviously, it may be seen Find out the introductory, if they point to the degree of reliability of the statement - you obviously want to apologize for your act? Next month, I may leave to rest. You can see if you want to tell us the whole truth? These words can be included in the faugibles - it became obvious that it is necessary to look for another way to solve the problem. This became possible thanks to the agreed actions of the fire brigade. Sun is not visible due to clouds.
Probably right, exactly, naturally It turns out to be introduced when specifying the degree of reliability of the reported (in this case, they are interchangeable or can be replaced by the words close in the meaning of this group) - you probably (\u003d must be), and do not understand how important it is to do it on time. Are you sure, and is there the same sorts? She, for sure, was a beauty. All these arguments, of course, so far only our assumptions. The same words are members of the proposal (circumstances) - it is true (\u003d correctly, the circumstance of an image of action) translated the text. I probably do not know (\u003d surely, the circumstance of the image of action), but he had to do it called me. The student is accurate (\u003d correctly) solved the task. This naturally (\u003d naturally) led us to the only correct answer.
By the way, it is an introductory word, if it indicates the connection of thoughts - he is a good athlete. By the way, he also learns well. This word does not appear as an introductory in the meaning "at the same time" - I will go string, by the way I will buy bread.
By the way, it turns out to be an introductory word, pointing to the connection of thoughts - her parents, girlfriends and, by the way, the best friend against the trip. This word can be used as an unbalance in context - he uttered a long speech, in which by the way noted that he would soon become our boss.
First of all, as an introductory word indicates the connection of thoughts - first of all (\u003d first), is it necessary to raise such a delicate topic? This word can act as the circumstance of time (\u003d first) - first of all I want to convey from your parents. It must be said that in the same phrase "first of all" can be considered as an introductory, and there is no, depending on the author's will.
Indeed, undoubtedly, of course, actually will be introductory if they indicate the degree of reliability of the reported - from this hill, indeed (\u003d exactly, in fact, without any doubt), the most best view. Undoubtedly (\u003d In fact, really), your child is capable of music. He certainly read this novel. - Or at the reception of thinking - here, actually, and the whole story. The same words are not introductory, if they perform in other values \u200b\u200b- I really, as you imagined me (\u003d in reality, in fact). He was undoubtedly a talented composer (\u003d no doubt, in fact). She is definitely the right, offering us such a simple way to solve the problem (\u003d very, very right). I didn't have anything against the school, but I didn't want to go to this (\u003d at all, it was). The words "really" and "unconditionally" depending on the intonation proposed by the speaker may be in the same context or input, or not.
Thus, further, then, finally, in the end As input words indicate the sequence of thought - and, then, it turned out to be a celebrity. Next, we will say about our conclusions. Thus (\u003d So), our results do not contradict the received by other scientists. She is smart, beautiful and finally, she is very good to me. What, in the end, do you want from me? Usually, the proposals containing the above words are completing a number of transfers, the words themselves matters "and more." In the context, the words "first", "secondly", "on the one hand", can meet above. "Thus," in the value of the introductory word, not only the completion of the listing, but also with the conclusion.

The same words are not allocated as introductory in the values: "Thus," \u003d "In this way" - so it was able to move the heavy wardrobe. "Next" \u003d "then" - then the word is provided to the second opponent. Usually in the previous context there are time circumstances, for example, "first". "Then" \u003d "Then, after that" - and then he became a famous scientist. "Finally," \u003d "at the end, finally, after everything, as a result of everything," finally all the affairs were safely completed. Usually in this meaning to the word "finally" a particle "-to" can be added, which is impossible to do if "finally" is an introductory word. In the same values, which are indicated above for "finally", is not an introductory combination "in the end" - in the end (\u003d As a result) the agreement was achieved.
However, it is introductory, if it stands in the middle or at the end of the sentence - rain, however, walked the second week, despite the forecasts of weather forecasters. As I deftly, however! However, it does not turn out to be introduced at the beginning of the proposal and at the beginning of a complex proposal when it acts as a Provincial Union (\u003d but) - however, people did not want to believe in his good intentions. We did not hoped to meet, but we were lucky.
In general, it is introductory in the meaning "Generally speaking," when it indicates a way of issuing thoughts - its work, in general, is of interest only for the narrow circle of specialists. In other values, the word "generally" is at the meaning "in general, at all, in all respects, under all conditions, always" - Ostrovsky for the Russian theater is the same as Pushkin for literature at all. According to the new law, smoking in the workplace is generally prohibited.
In my opinion, in your opinion, in our opinion, in your opinion They are introductable, pointing to the source of the message - your child, in my opinion, has witnessed. Do you think something proves? The word "in his own way" is not input - he is right.
Of course, it is most often introduced, indicates the degree of reliability of the statement - we, of course, are ready to help you in everything. Sometimes this word is not separated if the intonation is distinguished by the tone of confidence, conviction. In this case, the word "of course" is considered an amplifier particle - I certainly agreed if you warned me in advance.
ANYWAY It is more often introduced and used to evaluate - I, in any case, would not like to remember it. These words, in any case, indicate the seriousness of his relationship to life. In the meaning "always, under any circumstances," this combination is not input is not - I have ever had to meet it today and talk to him.
In fact, it is not yet introduced, speaking in the meaning "indeed" - Petya is in fact well versed in computers. I really don't matter here. Less often, this phrase turns out to be introduced, if it serves to express bewilderment, indignation - what are you, in fact, are you going to make a clever?
In turn, it may be introductory when it indicates the connection of thoughts or on the method of design of thought - among many modern writers, Vladimir Sorokin causes interest, and among his books, in turn, you can especially allocate "Roman". Asking me to help him in the work, he, in turn, also did not idle. This phrase can be unbounded in the values \u200b\u200bof "in response", "for its part" (\u003d when there comes the turn) - Masha, in turn, told about how she spent the summer.
So it is introductory, if it can be replaced by the words "therefore," "began to be" - a complicated message, which means that it must be transferred today. The rain has already ended, it means that we can go for a walk. If she fights so hard with us, it means that she feels his right. This word can be a lean, close in meaning to "means" - the dog means more for him than the wife. When you truly be friends with a person, it means that he trust in everything. "So" may be between the subject and faithful, especially when they are expressed by infinitives. In this case, before "means" puts a dash - to be offended - it means to recognize itself weak. To be friends - it means to trust your friend.
On the contrary, it is introductory, if it indicates the connection of thoughts - he did not want to offend her, but, on the contrary, he tried to ask her for forgiveness. Instead of playing sports, she, on the contrary, sitting at home all day. It is not an introductory combination "and vice versa", which can act as a homogeneous sentence, it is used as a word that replaces a whole proposal or part of it. - Spring girls change: brunettes become blondes and the opposite (i.e. blondes brunettes). The more you do, the more high estimates you get, and vice versa (i.e., if you are doing a little, the estimates will be bad; the comma in front of "and" turns out to be at the end of the proposal - it turns out a complex proposal, where "on the contrary" replaces its second part). I know that he will fulfill my request and on the contrary (i.e. I will fulfill it, before "and" there is no comma, since "on the contrary," replaces homogeneous apparent).
At least it is introductory, if the value of the assessment is Misha, at least knows how to behave, and not picks up a fork in the teeth. This phrase can be used in the values \u200b\u200bof "no less than", "the smaller one", then it is not separated - she will at least know that her father did not live in vain. At least five of the class must take part in the ski racing.
From the point of view is the introductory in the meaning of "according to" - from the point of view of my grandmother, the girl should not wear pants. Her answer, from the point of view of examiners, is worthy of the highest assessment. The same turn may have the meaning of "against" and then the introductory is not - the work goes according to plan from the point of view of deadlines. If we evaluate the behavior of the heroes of some literary works from the point of view of modern morality, it should be considered immoral.
In particular, it is allocated as an introductory, if indicating the connection of thoughts in the statement - it is interested in, in particular, the question of the contribution of this scientist in the development of the theory of relativity. The company takes an active part in charitable activities and, in particular, helps the orphanage No. 187. If the combination in particular was at the beginning or at the end of the connecting structure, then it is not separated from this design (this will be discussed in more detail in the next section) - I love books about animals, in particular about dogs. My friends, in particular Masha and Vadim, rested this summer in Spain. The specified combination does not stand out as an introductory, if it is connected by the Union "and" with the word "generally" - the conversation went about politics in general and in particular the recent government solutions.
It is mainly introductory when it serves to evaluate some fact, its allocation in the statement - the textbook should be rewritten and, mainly, add such chapters to it ... The room was used for solemn cases and, mainly to organize parade dinners. This combination can be part of the connecting structure, in this case, if it stands at its beginning or at the end, is not separated from the semicolon itself - many Russian people, mainly representatives of the intelligentsia, did not believe the promises of the government. In the meaning "First of all," the "most" is a combination is not introductory and is not inspired - he was afraid of writings mainly due to its illiteracy. I like it mainly in his attitude towards parents.
For example, it will always be introductory, but is drawn up differently. It can be allocated by commas from two sides - Pavel Petrovich man is extremely attentive to his appearance, for example, he carefully cares for his nails. If "for example" turns out to be at the beginning or at the end of an already separate member, it is not separated from this turn - in many large cities, for example in Moscow, there is an unfavorable environmental situation. Some works of Russian writers, such as Evgeny Onegin or "War and Peace", served as the basis for creating artistic film not only in Russia, but also in other countries. In addition, after "for example," a colon can stand, if "for example" stands after a generalizing word in front of a number of homogeneous members - some fruits can cause allergies, for example: oranges, tangerines, pineapple, red berries.

Task 2. In the text below, arrange the punctuation marks during introductory words. In the phrase allocated in italics, all the punctuation marks are missed, try to place them and explain how the rules of the Russian language had to take advantage.

Student 6 "b" class Nikita Pimpnikov was undoubtedly lazy. Naturally, his laziness led to getting bad assessments at school, and therefore he was also a two-way. In general, he could sometimes fight his laziness and then to the joy of all teachers received the "four", but the desire to overcome himself arose in Nikita not often. By the way, his laziness spread only for homework and maybe even some unpleasant duties for the house for example, dishes and cleaning the room. But Nikita had time and strength on pranks, computer games And definitely on football. Actually, against visiting school of pimples did not have anything, some lessons in particular physical education and drawing even delivered pleasure, but mathematics and mostly Russian language delivered unbearable suffering. First of all, he did not always correctly understood the rule, but perceived him in his own way, as it seemed more precisely. Next, Nikita could not apply this rule in practice means leaving a lot of errors. Perhaps he was required to understand the material more time, but it was not in Nikita. Having come from school, he first turned on the computer and at least an hour played an interesting and useful toy from his point of view. Then he fled to the courtyard and played football, demonstrating the dexterity and speed of the reaction. He really loved the sport, and then the boy must run and jump, in the end he should grow strong and stronger. Sit at home and read boring books means becoming sluggish and weak, and this in turn can lead to diseases. Is it really not more important to football books? These his thoughts of Nikita expressed his father, and he in turn supported his son and defended from Mom, which, on the contrary, considered the most important "five" in the diary.
Next, Nikita rested, watched TV or played on the computer again. After that, the lessons remained just 30 minutes, because Mom demanded to go to bed no later than at 21.30. And it was in these half an hour on Nikita attacked lazy, in any case this condition could only be called so. The boy sluggishly moved the page of textbooks mainly trying to remember what they were talking in the classroom and convincing himself what and so everything remembers the closing books. Thus, the lessons remained ultimately not made, and among teachers a hard view that Nikita pimples is undoubtedly lazy. Do you really think so?

Hello! Explain, why is it before the union and is a comma? What should be guided by the rule here? I love you life, and I want better you become.

Running punctuation: I love you, life, and I want to better be. Appeal a life Allocated with commas on both sides.


	Question No. 304149.

Good morning! Yesterday I came across the offer: this option is not particularly popular, probably due to ambiguity. It seems to be good, but I do not understand why "probably" is isolated (and not just separated by a comma from "popularity"). In principle, everything is clear: the introductory word. But Lopadine has such an example: one night, there must be from mischief, the facade of the city Duma was saved. And I can not understand what these two proposals differ. And in general, what "should be from mischief"? It simply sounds like this: punctuation in the introductory words that are standing at the beginning and at the end of separate revolutions. But here, if you remove "must be", there is no separate turnover. And if adding "must be" - it seems and a separate turnover appears. But what? Connecting? More explanations why he is isolated, I do not have. In general, help! Thank you so much!