Calculation of fees for the discharge of pollutants into water bodies. Calculation of fees for unorganized discharge of pollutants. List of used regulatory and methodical materials

25.05.2019

A TASK. The company produces reset wastewater In the river having a fisheries appointment. The volumetric flow rate of wastewater is q \u003d 1000 m3 / day. Wastewater contains organic substances characterized by the overall indicator of the BOD (MPC \u003d 3.0), petroleum products (MPC \u003d 0.05), nitrites (MPC \u003d 0.02), nitrates (MPC \u003d 0.1), phenols (MPC \u003d 0.001), suspended substances (MPK \u003d 2.0 ). Calculate the fee that the enterprise will make a discharge of pollutants into the river.

Some of the main elements of typical permissions include. It lists the name and address of the discharge, description and location of the reset, the state of receiving the water object, the appointed uses, the date of entry into force of the permission and the date of its expiration. Sometimes a page with constraints on pollutants will read only "Monitor and Report". This may occur when there is uncertainty regarding the discharged amount and some screening is required. Newsletter or logical sheet: This section is often a separate application with useful information about permitted activities. It may include additional information On the wastewater treatment process or about the receiving water object.

Cover: Usually it gives the best resolution image.
Pollution limits: This is "meat and potatoes" permission.

At the end of the permission, as a rule, there are also several pages of "template" languages.

Table 1. Task data.

Table 2. Pollutants

Calculation of payments for the discharge of organic substances characterized by the general

indicator BOD:

1. M f - we calculate the mass of substance discharged for the year (54 mg / l \u003d 54 g / m3):

M f \u003d · v \u003d c f Q · 365

M Φ \u003d 54 g / m3 · 1000 / compell .·365Sut/engty\u003d19710000g/a) \u003d 19.71 tons / year.

2. M n - we calculate a mass of substance discharged within the MPC:

In some states, this included the requirements for identification marks on each pipe disclosing in the state of the state. When viewing permissions, do not miss this language. This section of permits will often indicate the most important requirements. The most important thing is that the public notice of each project of individual permission should be distributed to the interested and affected public. Get a mailing list for permissions in your watershed. Across the country, several government licensing agencies provide a notice of issuing permits long before issuing permission.

M n \u003d s n · v,

M n \u003d 3.0 · 1000 · 365 \u003d 1095000 g / m3 \u003d 1,095 tons / year.

3. M L - the mass limit (discharge volume within the limits), which is established by local environmental organizations on the basis of

documents confirming payments for the previous year. Since the number of regulatory pollution is included in the limit, the limit mass is calculated as the difference in super-luminous and regulatory concentrations multiplied by volume.

As soon as you pay relationships with the agency staff, you can get information about permissions earlier. Most citizens believe that each proposed arrester or regulated activity is specifically studied and that permission requirements are developed taking into account this particular type of activity and location.

"General permits" are designed for numerous categories of activities within the political or geographical border that have similar operations and discharges require similar restrictions or conditions of operation and require similar monitoring requirements. General permits are commonly used to contaminate stormwater, concentrated animal feeding operations, many types of mining and often for industrial discharge categories. If business owners believe that their enterprise qualifies in accordance with the existing overall category of permits, they can apply to cover this permission.

We calculate the mass of substance discharged within the established

M l \u003d (with l - s n) · v,

M L \u003d (20.0-3.0) · 1000 · 365 \u003d 6205000 g / m3 \u003d 6,205 t / year.

4. m SL - the mass of pollutants dropping over the established standards and limits is calculated as the difference between the actually discharged mass and mass normative and limit:

M Sl \u003d m f - (m l + m n),

Usually they do it through an application called "Notice of Intention" to cover permission. The permit agency has the right to reject the application and demand to apply for an individual permission. The overall permit is developed and updated every five years and can vary significantly depending on what activity is allowed to perform. It will describe actions for which permission is applied. It should discuss the potential impact of these activities and indicate when the activity is not suitable for general permission.

M Sl \u003d 19.71 - (6.205 +1.095) \u003d 12.41 t / year.

5. PN - fee carried out for the discharge of pollutants within the limiting permissible standards discharges (included in the cost):

P H \u003d J · to ind · · m n,

PN \u003d 2.22 · 90 · 1/3 · 1.095 \u003d 72,927 rub.

where j is the basic standards for the discharge of 1 conditional ton of pollutants in water objects; J \u003d 2,22 rub / Sl.T

For example, if activity can affect fish during its migration or spawning, permission can limit the time and duration of activity. The permission will also contain a description of the information necessary to each applicant and compliance requirements.

Each applicant who wants to receive such permission must submit the form of "notice of intent". General permits usually require less frequent observations and reporting than individual permissions, and sometimes at all. Many general requirements Permissions are completed in the development and implementation of management plans, which should take into account possible pollution and impact on the designated and existing uses using the best management methods. However, these management plans, whether for storm waters or mountain workings or feeding sites, are rarely required for submission to the permissive agency.

K ind - indexing coefficient, K ind \u003d 90.

M N is a mass of pollutant discharged within standards, t / year.

6. PL - fee carried out for the discharge of pollutants within the agreed discharge limits:

P l \u003d 5 · j ∙ to ind · · m l,

P l \u003d 5 · 2.22 · 90 · 1/3 · 6.205 \u003d 2066,265 rub.

7. PL - fee carried out for discharges of pollutants in excess of standards or agreed discharge limits (held from profits):

General permissions are subject to public notification and review only during the initial development of permission and during each five-year resolution of permission. There is a limited public and interdepartmental review of each application for coverage in accordance with the total resolution throughout the five-year period.

The identification of specific problems during the public review every five years is very important, given that an unlimited number of committees may be included within each common permission. Information on committees covered by each total resolution is publicly available and must be available in your permissive agency. If not, think about submitting a request "Law on Freedom Information" to receive it.

N \u003d 25 · j · to ind · · m

P Sl \u003d 25 · 2.22 · 90 · 1/3 · 12,41 \u003d 20662.65 rub.

8. The fee carried out by the enterprise for individual pollution for the year:

Pi \u003d (n + p l + p sl) · k e ∙ k s,

where k e is the environmental coefficient; k e \u003d 1.0;

kc - coefficient taking into account the location of the object for the regions of the Far North; KS \u003d 2.0.

N \u003d (72,927 +2066,265 +20662,65) ∙ 1 ∙ 2 \u003d 45603,68 руб.

If the overall permit is unlikely to protect the receiving water object, citizens may apply for an individual permission. The level of processing required for each discharger is determined by the reset category and the state of the receiving water object. The minimum limits set for the category of discharges, regardless of their location, are called "technologies based". The limits caused by water quality standards and the current conditions of the receiving reservoir are considered "water-based".

In the law on clean water, a two-component system, each resolution must contain restrictions for each pollutant based on a more stringent two types of controls in this particular situation. For one permission, there is nothing unusual to contain some limitations for each type.

The calculation of payments for the remaining substances is made similar to this calculation. The amount of payments for resetting all pollutants is shown in Table 3.

Name of ingredients	Actual reset	Mounted reset	Payments for pollution
normative	Limit	Overtime	Noriative fee	Limit board	Super-dimensional fee	Fee
Concentration / Massa	SF mg / l	MF T / year	CH (MPC) mg / l	Mg / l	Sl mg / l	Ml t / year	Msl t / year	PN Rose / Year	PLAB / year	Psl rub / year	Pood / year
BPK		19,71	3,0	1,095	20,0	6,205	12,41	72,927	2066,3	20662,65	45603,68
Petroleum products	1,6	0,584	0,05	0,018	-	-	0,566	72,927	-	56543,4	113232,65
Nitrit	1,0	0,365	0,02	0,007	0,2	0,065	0,293	72,927	3246,75	73176,75	152986,86
Nitrate	10,0	3,65	0,1	0,036	8,0	2,88	0,734	72,927	28771,2	36663,3	131012,8
Phenols	0,008	0,003	0,001	0,0004	-	-	0,0026	72,927	-		26133,84
Weighted substances	45,0	16,425	2,0	0,73	15,0	4,745	10,95	72,927	2370,13	27347,6	59581,36
Total paid from the cost	437,56	528113,64	528551,2
TOTAL, paid from profits
The fee of the enterprise for the discharge of all pollutants per year - n

Table 3. Payment Calculation

"Permission to use technology"

The provisions of the Clean Water Act establishes the minimum limits for controlling pollution for many categories of industrial discharges, wastewater discharges and for a growing number of other types of discharges. Regardless of any reasons associated with a specific site, all the arresters must correspond to at least the minimum limit applicable to all the others in the same category.

Permits may prescribe specific methods or testing of point sources or the best control methods for inaccular sources, but they rarely do. Many understand that based on technology restrictions are modern condition In the field of pollution control technologies. It was described as a representation of the average performance of the best performers. However, thirty years after the adoption of the law, individual arresters can often achieve a higher level of productivity than what is determined by national technology-based restrictions.

Output: According to calculations of fees for discharged polluted substances into the environment, the amount of payments for this enterprise is 528551.20 rubles / year

Bibliography.

1.Akimova TA Ecology: studies. For universities / TA Akimova, V.V. Khaskin - 2nd ed., Pererab. and add. - M.: Uniti - Dana, 2000. - 566 p.

2. Girus E.V. Ecology and economics of environmental management: studies. For universities / E.V. Girus, S.N. Bobyl, A.L. Novoselov, N.V. Chepurny - ed. E.V. Girusova - M.: Law and Law, Uniti, 1998. - 455 p.

Limits of water quality permits

In many cases, the limitations based on technologies are not sufficient to protect the receiving water object. If the discharge is large or high-concentrated or if the receiving water is small or environmentally sensitive, the discharge can easily overload with water, unless the arrester simply meets the minimum technological restrictions.

The authors of the Law on Clean Water understood that restrictions based on technologies are often insufficient. This decisive reverse stroke system requires that each discharger applied so much additional processing as it is necessary to meet water quality standards for the receiving water itself.

3. Stadnitsky G.V., Ecology: studies. Handbook for universities / GV. Stadnitsky, A.I. Rodionov - 4th ed., Reflected. - SPb.: Chemistry, 1997. -240 p.

State Committee to the Russian Federation for Environmental Protection

Wastewater limits based on water quality are often required when the applicant requests permission to a relatively large amount of output relative to a relatively small flow. They may be needed when the receiving water is naturally limited in its ability to absorb pollution or when the water object already carrying severe pollution cannot absorb more, without violating water quality standards. As the pollution pressure in the watershed increases, the allowed limits are more often governed by water quality standards.

Methodical instructions Painting fee for an inorganized discharge of pollutants into water bodies

Approve

Chairman of state
committee Russian Federation
on guard ambient
V.I. Danilov Danilian
“29 ” december 1998

Moscow, 1998.

The instruction of charging fees for an inorganized discharge of pollutants into water belongings was developed in the development of the Law of the RSFSR of 19.12.91 No. 2060-1 "On the Protection of Natural Environment" (Vedomosti Congress of People's Deputies of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation, 1992, No. 10, Article 457) , Decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28.08.92 No. 632 "Education of the procedure for determining the board and its limit sizes for pollution natural environment, waste disposal, other types of harmmers" (Meeting of acts of the President and Government of the Russian Federation, 1992, No. 10, Article.726) , from 26.05.97 No. 643 "On approval of the Regulations on the State Committee of the Russian Federation on Environmental Protection" (assembly of the budget of the Russian Federation, 1997, No. 22, Article 22605).

Unlike the minimum limiting emission levels based on technologies that have a component of economic feasibility, water quality restrictions are established to ensure that water quality standards are not broken regardless of economic consequences.

Control of compliance with these restrictions

Most of the monitoring of permitted discharges is carried out by the Committees themselves. State and federal officials conduct sample checks, but the overwhelming majority of information about dismissal and permission to comply with compliance and submitted by the Committees.

for< £

where: - fee for chopping stories within the established limits (rubles);

To ind-acid indexing fee;

Relief rate for reset 1 toni. -to pollutant within the established limit (rub. / t);

Actual reseti. -Ho polluting (T);

Maximum permissible discharge of pollutant (T);

Separate committees represent monitoring reports to the permissive agency. Reports on the monitoring of discharges are usually coming monthly. Failure properly and timely is a permit violation. When the violations are obvious, forced action is valid. General permits usually do not have similar monthly reporting requirements, but they may have other requirements such as annual reporting.

You will find several different formal opportunities for entering, as well as a number of more informal opportunities. Therefore, if you do not have time to develop a problem or problem during a public review, it is important to at least increase it at the time. If you go to court later, you may have to show that you have exhausted all administrative means of protection to solve your problems.

Resetting the i-th pollutivation within the established limit (T);

n. - Number of pollutants.

i shows the type of polluting (i \u003d 1.2 ....n);

(4)

where: - the basic standards for reset 1 ton of the i-th pollutant within the established component (rub. / t);

How is the activities allowed in accordance with this general resolution violates water quality standards? You can and must document the adverse effects of public activities. Such documentation can be used to improve overall permit or in some cases requires individual permissions.

Many states now publish public notifications on their sites. You can request a notice when permissions are considered on your watershed. Nevertheless, few states may notify the watershed. Every day it takes into account when you are trying to solve a technical or legal issue and raise public awareness and maintain your position.

To e water - the coefficient environmental situation and the environmental significance of the surface water supply.

(6)

2.5. Basic standards of information charges for dischargeing pollutants, indexing coefficients of the basic components of the board and the environmental situation and significance water objectsaccepted in accordance with their values \u200b\u200boperating in the installed software.

3. The procedure and features of determining the mass of the discharge substances

3.1. Industrial-urbanized territories (land employed by industrial, transport, shopping and warehouse and other non-agricultural enterprises organizations).

where: S. -The city of the territory (catchment) of the nature user, ha;

W D, W T, W P - the volume of the settlement of respectively, melting and watering waters, m 3 / ha;

m i d, m i t, m i n - concentration i - controversial substance in stock (respectively, raindrops, melting and irrigation, mg / l;

S P. - Square of waterproof airproofs exposed to wet cleaning, ha.

3.1.2. Area-plated coatings (roads, platforms, etc.) and the total area of \u200b\u200bthe territory of the territory on which contaminated surface runoff is formed, are determined according to the master plan for land management, and in its absence, according to the form of the form of statistical reporting No. 22 "User Report", approved Decree of the State Statistics Committee of August 27, 1998 No. 90.

where: n d - layers for warm periods and average pulp up 0° C is determined by the data of the data methodorological observations of the territorial body of the hydrometeorological service, mm;

To Q. - The coefficient that takes into account the volume of rainwater drainage depending on the intensity of rain for this area is 20 minutes. With a period of one-time exceeding the estimated rain intensity equal to the one (q 20. ), determined according to the table below.

q 20.	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100	120
To Q.	0,96	0,91	0,87	0,82	0,78	0,75	0,71	0,68	0,65	0,60

Value Q 20. determined according to.

To the in-coefficient, which takes into account the intensity of the formation of the formal drain, depending on the degree of propagation of waterproof surfaces P in 2 (roofs of buildings, roads, platforms, sidewalks, etc.) on the area of \u200b\u200bthe catchment area, is determined according to the data below.

P IN.	10	20	30	40	50	60	70	80	90	100
To IN.	0,4	0,6	0,8	1,0	1,2	1,4	1,6	1,8	2,0	2,2

________________

2 Valida IN. (%) is defined as the ratio of area-proof surfaces to the total area of \u200b\u200bthe territory of the nature user.

3.1.4. Tax waters stock volume is determined by:

where: N T - layer of precipitation during the cold period with average temperatures below0° C is determined according to the data of meteorological observations of the territorial organagidrometrocerer, mm;

K T - the coefficient that takes into account the volume of the flow of meltwater depending on the conditions of the snowmate is determined by the table below below;

Zones under the conditions of the spring drain of melting water
The value of the CT coefficient	0,47	0,56	0,69	0,77

To P - coefficient, taking into account snow removal from the territory of the nature user. In the absence of a removal unit is taken equal to 10 with a decrease in its value proportional to snow export.

The mass of the inorganized-binding of pollutants within the established limits is recommended when the content in the level of content in rain, wax and watering water-based pollutants exceeding their average background concentrations of the intricual stock on the built-up areas with high levels Improvement, or with specific pollutants (). At the same time, special attention is recommended to be given to toxic substances, which in significant amounts are contained in the initial raw material used by brace.

In the presence of a production or state analytical control of the actual constraints of pollutants to determine the mass of their discharge in the stocks, testele and polyvochetic waters are made by its results, and the planned (regulatory) concentrations of pollutants for determining the extrepical and within the limits of their masses of their discharge is recommended to make supporting applications data and .

In the absence of an analytical system for the surface runoff, planned (regulatory) concentrations of comprehensive substances, mandatoryly included in the calculation for unproductive users to determine the extremely permissible and within the limitamas of their reset, are taken on the basis of applications data and, and the actual concentrations of pollutants, at the level of the mass taken Their reset within the limit.

For environmental users, which, according to production conditions, cannot fully (inverse configuration of analytical control data) to eliminate the entry of the intrinsic flow of specific substances with highly toxic properties (enterprises of non-ferrous metallurgy, mining, chemical, forestry, pulp and paper, oil refining and petrochemical industries, leather plants, Meat processing plants, coal-operating power plants), we are recommended to take into account impurities specific for data production.

3.2.The farming territories of industrial purposes (land, occupational, poultry farms and complexes, frequencies, parking lots of cars and agricultural machinery, processing shops and utility production).

3.2.1. The mass of the discharge stress with an inorganized runoff from the territory (catchment) of the nature user is determined in accordance with. Methodical instructions.

3.2.2. The area of \u200b\u200bthe production facilities (nonsellharoid) and the specific gravity in this area of \u200b\u200bwaterproof surfaces (solid coatings) is determined according to the master plan of the land management company, or the form of statisticality No. 22 "Report on User Example".

In the absence of actual ones about the functional structure of the area of \u200b\u200bthe area (catchment) of the surface room from the flowing platforms, it is recommended to calculate, based on the hygienic substitution of livestock (birds) in square. meters on one head: Dairy cows -100, cattle - 50, pigs - 10, sheep - 20, poultry 1. The area of \u200b\u200bopen costs of cars and other agricultural equipment is 8-10% of the community-selling enterprises (without farmland).

3.2.3. The volumes of lathe, melt and irrigation waters are determined in accordance with P.P. . . Meeting instructions.

3.2.4. In the presence of a production or state analytical control of the actual constraints of pollutants to determine the mass of their discharge in the stocks, testele and polyvochetic waters are made by its results, and the planned (regulatory) concentrations of pollutants for determining the extrepical and within the limits of their masses of their discharge is recommended to make supporting applications data and .

In absence of analytic control over the surface runoff, the planned concentrations of evaluating substances, mandatoryly included in the calculations for all-industrial users to determine the extremely permissible and within the limitamas of their reset, it is recommended to be taken on the basis of these applications and, and the actual concentrations of pollutants at the level of the assigned mass of their discharge limit limit.

3.3.Oroded and erosion-hazardous land of agricultural purposes.

3.3.1. The mass relief mass of the pollutant is a snow-rocked runoff from the territory (catchment) of nature users is determined by the formula:

(11)

where s is -Tell of eroded and erosion-hazardous lands, ha;

P mass of the soil of soil from eroded and erosionly dangerous lands. t / ha per year;

q I. - the content of the I-gossipping substance in the washed soil, kg / t;

In B - the proportion of the removal of soil erosion products outside the catchment,% of the volume (accepted from 1 to 10%, depending on the leafy of the frozen-beam network, 0.2 to 2.0 km / sq. Cm or an average of 3%).

3.3.2. The blind and erosion-hazardous land of agricultural transaction are determined according to soil surveys or planning system of nature user.

3.3.3. With the insonitoring of soil cover, the actual mass of soil washing from eroded Ierosion-hazardous lands and the content of pollutants in it is made by the results.

In the absence of controlling the mass of the discharge can be carried out only on suspended substances, for the valueq I. It is accepted equal to 1000, and the mass of the soil of the soils of eroded and erosion-hazardous land is recommended to be received according to data.

3.3.4. With an inorganized scarce of pollutants from eroded and erosion-hazardous land of agricultural transaction, their mass, determined in accordance with. Refers to permitted to reset in the limits. When calculating the size of the board in the indicator M I. it is accepted equal to zero.

3.3.5. For the users carrying out anti-erosion events, but non-relevant water protection strips On the shores of the water bodies, when calculating the size payroll in recommended a downward coefficient (K LT), reflecting the level of anti-erosion vehicles:

(12)

where to l, to t, - coefficients, taking into account the degree of reduction in the intensity of removal and self-associated and hard-soluble compounds of pollutants;

for easily solutions:

(13)

for hard-soluble compounds:

(14)

where s um - Square Lands, which mastered the soil crop rotations, anti-erosion events, ha;

S EZ. - The area of \u200b\u200beroded Ierosion-hazardous agricultural land, ha.

3.3.6. For software users having water protection bands, occupied by meadow or thebert plantings and b) mixed or spruce plantings, delaying erosional origin products, when calculating the value of the board, it is recommended to further additionally be reduced coefficients (to in), respectively, in the amount of 0.1 and /.0.04.

3.4. The maintenance of the main use of the main use.

3.4.1. The mass of the discharge-eyed substance with an inorganized flow from the territory (catchment) of the nature user is determined by the exception of the component relating to the flow of watering waters.

3.4.2. The area of \u200b\u200bthe territory (logging of the main use) of the nature user is determined by the evaluation of the deforestation or the form of the statistivity of 2-lx, the approved state of the State Statistics Committee of 14.12.92 No. 192.

3.4.3. The volume of flow of rapid waters is determined in accordance with the formulas and the input of the coefficient of accounting the share of disturbed lands, which are sources. The specified coefficient (U H) is accepted in the amount of: Purchased logging - 0.85; For gradual and selective logging - 0.5.

3.4.5. In the forests II and II group, in the presence of permission for an inorganized reset, the mass of pollution is recommended to determine within the limits of permissible standards, if the logging of the primary use is carried out in areas of the terrain with slopes less than 30° and while maintaining the water-protection bands along the other reservoirs, or within the established limits, if the rings are produced in areas of the area with slopes of more than 30° and (or) with a violation of water protection strips.

3.4.6. In the forests of the I group of inorganized discharge of pollutants, independently defining sections of the logging, it is recommended to be determined as super-luminous, if the rubbings are not due to the objectives of the forest management.

Applications

Fig. 2. Map of zoning meter territory of the Russian Federation under the conditions of drain water

Appendix 3. .

Concentrations of basic substances in surface drain on the built-up areas of the territory, the accepted calculation of the masses of pollution within the permissible standards

(mg / l)

	Rainwater	TELL WATER	Water water
Weighted substances	250	3500	500
Petroleum products	10	30	30
BPK	30	90	100
CPC	100	250	100
Sulfates	100	500	100
Chlorida	200	1500	200
Ammonia nitrogen		4,3
Nitrogen common	4,9	10,5	4,9
Nitrate	0,08	0,17	0,08
Nitrit	0,08	0,17	0,08
Calcium	43	113	43
Magnesium		14
Iron	0,3	1,7	0,3
Copper	0,02	0,076	0,02
Nickel	0,01	0,02	0,01
Zinc	0,3	0,55	0,3
Phosphorus common	1,08	1,08	1,08

Appendix 4. .

Concentrations of the main pollutants and specific impurities in surface drain from the territories of enterprises of the enterprises of the industries for calculating the masses of pollution in the limits

	Processing of polymetallic ores		Production aluminum	Mineral fertilizer production	Production of synthetic rubber	Power plants working on the corner
	Enrichment of ore	metal production	Production aluminum	Mineral fertilizer production	Production of synthetic rubber	Power plants working on the corner

Weighted substances	6000	4500	4500		4500	6000
Petroleum products	50-60	50-60	50-60		50-60	50-60
BPK					500
CPC					3700
nitrogen common				110
phosphorus common				50
zinc	15-38	0,8-3,0
copper	0,6-2,3
magnesium	38-73	45-64	38-220
chlorida		5000-6000	3300-4100

phenols					21,5-22,0	0,006-0,03
dimethyl sulfide
sulfites
resin
turpentine
SPAV
formaldehyde
benzene
toluene					up to 0,2
styrene					up to 0.6
acetaldehyde					up to 26.7
acetone					up to 8.0
ethylbenzene					up to 0,2
ammonia				100
fats, oils
fluorine		18-445	90-550	10		3,1-5,0
arsenic		up to 37.5				0,03-0,05
chromium					0,01
lead	1,5-1,7	0,4-0,6
titanium	1,5	1,5
vanadium						0,8-0,95
tetraethylswin

Continuing application 4.

	Lesochemical plants	Cellulosic and paper plants	Petrochemical Combines	Tannery	Meat processing plants
Concentration of basic substances, mg / l
Weighted substances	4500	4500	4500	6000	6000
Petroleum products	50-60	50-60	50-60	50-60	50-60
BPK	600	135	300	390	150-1100
XPK	1000	350	920	1500	2830
nitrogen common					200
phosphorus common					60
zinc
copper
magnesium
chlorida
Concentration of specific impurities, mg / l
phenols	0,08-15,0	0,06	up to 0.3.	up to 0.5
dimethyl sulfide	0,4	13-15
sulfites		up to 100.
resin	150-300
turpentine	0,5-5
SPAV			0,2-0,7	43
formaldehyde			0,3-0,6
benzene			up to 200.
toluene			up to 20.
styrene			up to 0.5
acetaldehyde
acetone
ethylbenzene
ammonia					27-34
fats, oils				270	100-453
fluorine
arsenic
chromium				30
lead
titanium
vanadium
tetraethylswin

Ending application 4.

	Enterprises of other industries	Construction Square	Motor transport and trade and warehouse organizations
Concentration of basic substances, mg / l
Weighted substances	2000	6000	2000
Petroleum products	50-60	90	90
BPK	210	210	210
CPC	500	500	500
nitrogen common
phosphorus common
zinc
copper
magnesium
chlorida
Concentration of specific impurities, mg / l
phenols
dimethyl sulfide
sulfites
resin
turpentine
SPAV
formaldehyde
benzene
toluene
styrene
acetaldehyde
acetone
ethylbenzene
ammonia
fats, oils
fluorine
arsenic
chromium
lead
titanium
vanadium
tetraethylswin			0,002

Appendix 5. .

The concentrations of basic substances in the surface stock of animal farms and complexes

mg / L.

	Weighted substances	BPK	Petroleum products
Frames of cattle and pigs	2000-3000	1000-1500	not
Infermer roads with solid coating	250-400	50-80	not
Open parking lots and agricultural machinery	800-1200	160-200	50-100
Roofs of buildings	75-120	25-40	not

Appendix 6. .

Concentrations of biogenventions in surface stock of livestock complexes

mg / L.

	Pinomplexes	Cattle complexes
Nitrogen common	1500-2500	600-800
Ammonia nitrogen	600-800	500-650
Phosphorus	500-900	350-450
Potassium	400-500	700-850

application 7 .

Estimated indicators of the endowment of products of erosion origin from arable land to the fergions of the European part of the Russian Federation

Subjects of the Russian Federation	Estimated washing of soil with 1 hectare Pashnya per year, t	Erosion-hazardous lands with a washout of more than 20 t / ha per year,% of the total Pashny Square

Northern District
Rep. Karelia	2,6
Rep. Komi.	6,9	6,7
Arkhangelsk region	4,9	2,5
Vologodskaya Oblast	6,1	3,7
Murmansk region	2,6
Northwest
Leningrad region	2,6	0,6
Novgorod region	4,5	3,5
Pskov region	5,8	5,5
central District
Bryansk region.	4,1	2,3
Vladimir region	5,5	3,3
Ivanovo region	6,5	2,1
Kaluga region	7,4	6,1
Kostroma region	5,6	1,7
Moscow region	7,7	9,0
Oryol Region	5,3	2,5
Ryazan Oblast	3,5	0,5
Smolensk region	7,7	11,0
Tver region	5,3	3,9
Tula region	7,5	5,5
Yaroslavl region	5,4	2,7
Volga-Vyatsky district
Rep. Mari El	7,1	5,0
Rep. Mordovia	6,0	3,8
Chuvash Rep.	8,6	8,9
Kirov region	6,2	14,3
Nizhny Novgorod Region	6,7	7,7
Central Chernozem District
Belgorod region	7,8	26,0
Voronezh region	3,6	8,8
Kursk Oblast	6,0	14,6
Lipetsk region.	3,2	5,6
Tambov Region	1,7	1,4
Volga region
Rep. Kalmykia	2,3	2,0
Rep. Tatarstan	2,9	6,4
Astrakhan Oblast	0,3	-
Volgograd region	1,7	1,1
Penza region	4,3	7,0
Samara Region	2,3	0,3
Saratov region	1,9	2,3
Ulyanovsk region	4,4	7,0
North Caucasian District
Rep. Adygea	6,8	5,1
Rep. Dagestan	0,25	-
Ingush Rep.	3,6	0,1
Kabardino-Balkar Rep.	13,5	24,0
Karachay-Circassian rep.	12,0	18,0
Rep. North Ossetia	14,3	2,7
Krasnodar region	5,4	6,3
Stavropol region	10,0	13,8
Rostov region	3,1	3,0
Ural district within the European part of the Russian Federation
Rep. Bashkortostan	3,0	0,5
Udmurt Rep.	9,7	12,0
Orenburg region	2,1	-
Perm region	12,1	12,7

Appendix 8. .

Calculated Practices of Pollution Surface Stream from Solid Rubber Areas

Pollutants	Concentration in surface drain for calculating masses of contaminants, mg / l in the presence of carrying residues and abandoned wood in the amount of 1 cubic meters / ha
Weighted substances	5000
Iron	150
Calcium	47
Magnesium	29
Sulfates	8
Nitrogen common	28
Phosphorus common	10
Potassium	29
Lignin	108
Smithful substances	17
Phenols	3,3
Easy-oxoles organic compounds BPK	3520
Petroleum products	75

LIST
used regulatory and methodical materials

1. Temporary instruction for designing structures for cleaning surface sewage, CH496-77. - M.: Stroyzdat, 1978.

3. Temporary guidelines To prevent pollution with superficial runoff from urban areas (rain, thale, waterway supplies), - M.: Rosgiproniselstroy, 1979.

4. Disagree and purification of surface sewage. - M.: MDNTP, 1983.

5. Cleaning and use of surface runoff from the territories of cities of and industrial enterprises. - M.: MDNTP, 1981.

6. The use of natural and wastewater. - Minsk, 1975.

7. Non-union norms of technological design of systems for removing and preparation for use of manure (ONTP-17-86). - M.: 1986.

8. Protection of water from pollution with superficial stock. - Kharkov: 1983.

9. Belotserkovsky M.Yu. et al. erosion processes on the European particles, their quantitative assessment and zoning // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Ser.5.Gography. 1990, № 2.

10. Zyabchenko S.S., Zagagurulskaya L.M., Lazareva I.P. Dynamics of equalization processes on continuous concentrated cutters of North Karelia. // Lesovod, 1988, No. 3.

11. Forership reference. - M.: Forest industry, 1987.

12. Enlarged expansion exchange rates for various industries. - M.: Stroyzdat, 1978.

Federal Service of Russia
(Roshydromet)
Northwest Territorial
Control
(North-West UTMS)
Tver Regional Center
on hydrometeorology and monitoring
ambient
(TCGMS)
170000 Tver, ul. Novotorzhskaya.d.27
Teletip 171788 R.GD.
__05. 03. 99 ___ N_40 / 13-C _____	Chairman of the committee
_na __№ 02.2-5 / 191th 26. 02. 99__	Shooky surrounding
	Wednesdays of the Tver region
	pozdnyakovaV. M.

REFERENCE

According to the calculation of precipitation (liquid and solid), the precipitation of precipitation (liquid and solid) is:

		cold period (mm)	warm period (mm)	year (mm)
1.	White	197	490	687
2.	Bezhetsk	169	435	604
3.	Bologoye	199	441	640
4.	Vyshny Volochek	177	441	618
5.	Western Dvina	255	564	818
6.	Kashin	173	399	572
7.	Red Hill	217	445	662
8.	Forest Reserve	237	485	722
9.	Maksatiha	193	422	615
10.	Ostashkov	204	467	671
11.	Rzhev	189	460	649
12.	Savelovo.	172	367	539
13.	Staria	187	454	641
14.	Tver	184	438	622
15.	Torch	156	421	527
16.	Toropets	269	478	747